China. A huge land with an economy growing at a rate which threatens US economic superiority. A country that is quietly outproducing the US and gaining massive amounts of manufacturing business. A country that has quietly been attempting to steal Negro jobs in the USA.
The latest attempt is being waged in the form of Sun Ming Ming, a 7 foot 9 tower of a man with limited basketball experience and skill.
Mr. Ming Ming has been signed by an ABA team in hopes of honing his skills and eventually rising to a roster spot in the NBA.
This is a very disturbing development, in that generally, roster spots on minor league teams are filled by young, dreamy eyed Negro males; struggling to earn a paycheck and someday make it to the NBA. This seems like an overt attempt by the Chinese government to stragetically play a role in keeping the Negro population from economic gain. It has not been determined as yet as to whether the Communist Chinese are attacking Negroes on their own accord, or are in partnership with the institutionalized racism that is the government of the USA. But it is clear: They will stop at nothing to keep young Negroes from getting these jobs.
Mr. Ming Ming is the latest example of what was started a few years ago. Engineering giant Chinamen in the hopes of using them to eradicate Negroes in the NBA. Production details are obviously still being worked out, and the plan seems to have taken a more grassroots angle. Rather than sending the legion of awkwardly mobile and odd looking Oriental giants to directly to the NBA, China has decided to slowly produce them and send them to the minor leagues. A clear attempt to not only hurt the Negro at the most basic and low level possible, but to attack from both the top and the bottom.
The sinister evidence is found in Mr. Ming Ming's medical history. After reaching his predetermined target height of 7 foot 9, the stategically placed pituitary tumor which caused his unnatural growth was quietly removed.
Wake up Negro folk: The sinister plot to hold us down thickens.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
34 comments:
NOIS is to the blog world what the majic johnson hour was to late night comedy.
will you let me come and fart on your blog like stern did to majic?
does nois give stock market advice?
what does it take to get my comment posted?
am i obliged to agree with all of your posts?
or is there a fibonacci seriers requirement that needs to be met?
"does nois give stock market advice?"
Sir, yes we do: Bet on black.
"will you let me come and fart on your blog like stern did to majic?"
Sir, we would be happy to allow you to give your best effort, but suspect that your butt plug will make it difficult to pass wind.
"what does it take to get my comment posted?"
Sir, all it takes is the ability to type and then click the "publish your comment" tab. If your comments aren't posting, YOU are doing something wrong.
The only comments we don't approve are those that have links to crappy "make quick money" sites.
"am i obliged to agree with all of your posts?"
Sir, of course not. We would never except one to agree with something that they clearly don't understand.
did you think to comment on why february is the national black history month? is china involved in this as well?
"did you think to comment on"
Sir, no we don't "think to comment on" whether China is involved in February being Black History Month. But we do think that Chinese calander we got from the buffet restaurant is racist. It clearly mocks Negroes with reference to "year of the Monkey".
By starting every one of your replies with "Sir", doesn't that disrespect women? It seems hypocritical to complain about other races disrespecting blacks when you disrespect women.
"By starting every one of your replies with "Sir", doesn't that disrespect women? It seems hypocritical to complain about other races disrespecting blacks when you disrespect women"
Sir, if you didn't post as anonymous we could be much more personal in addressing you.
Additionally, race and gender are not congruous comparisons for argument.
We are sorry if we offended you, ma'am.
sir
I am white and I married a black woman. My lovely wife told me that your inferance of a black person looking like a monkey just shows your ignorance into believing cultural stereotypes.
It might behoove you to not frequent that restaurnat any more. However, I believe that such a display would fall into the realm of economic empowerment rather than the entitlement mentality you display.
NOIS:
Alot of people post anonymously so due to the fact we dont want to succomb to the oppressive regime that is blogger webhosts.
Fight the powers that be. Just like the black athletes did in Mexico city in 68.
"I am white and I married a black woman."
Sir, this give you no currency.
I believe your wife is confused. The Chinese guys came up with the calander and the year of the monkey, not me. I just had to vision to see the racist intentions behind it.
"However, I believe that such a display would fall into the realm of economic empowerment rather than the entitlement mentality you display."
Or, you could just call it a boycott.
"Fight the powers that be. Just like the black athletes did in Mexico city in 68"
Sir, I type with black gloves on my hand as a show of solidarity.
ATTENTION:
Just wanted to take a moment to say hello to Columbus, OH!
Either you are the most racist person I have ever bare witness too, or you are the biggest fake on the planet. Either way, you are rather pathetic. No longer is the oppressive white man holding down, the demons that be now, are the Chinese. That's just funny. For everything that happens in this world there is one to claim conspiracy.
There was a time when it was the white man complaining about the blacks stealing the "white man's" job, then about a year ago it was the Mexican stealing the American jobs, now it's Chinese stealing the black man jobs.
You know why can't we just admit, that in this world there is more than one race, we were all created by the same God, and live on the same earth, under even the same sky. We share this planet, why can't we just accept each other and coexist. Oh that's right, you don't want to. So why is that anyone else's fault but your own?
Who cares about whether the no-talent scrub at the end of the bench is Chinese, Negro, or Serbian? There are more pressing issues.
Why do all Asians have such kicking-ass breath? Is it the food, hygiene, or just a mystery of life?
And why is it every time I see a hot Asian chick (or at least one with more than an "A" cup), she's always with some ugly Asian dude? Damn those chicks are loyal! A Negro woman will pursue a Caucasian man if she is somewhat educated, a Caucausian woman will pursue anything that has money or celebrity, but you'll always see an Asian woman on the arm of some nerdy, dung-breathed Asian man.
"we were all created by the same God"
Sir, we suggest you read about Yakub, the evil scientist. Everything you question shall be explained.
"Either you are the most racist person I have ever bare witness too"
Sir, by definition, suggesting that Negroes are being deprived jobs by Chinese basketball players is NOT a racist proposition. If you are going to call us racists, we request that you use the word in proper context. Your careless use of the word and simply bandying about said word is problematic, in that it usurps the true meaning and power of the word when we CORRECTLY use it to describe whites.
Thanks in advance.
"A Negro woman will pursue a Caucasian man if she is somewhat educated"
Sir, you misinterpret here. Education has nothing to do with it. A Negro woman will pursue a Caucasian man if she feels she can get into his pocket. Get it right.
Nation of Islam,
See that is exactly what I mean. Only you aren't smart enough to figure it out. YOU ARE RACIST!! If you don't like another race because they are that race, then you are a racist.
As for white people are racist. That in it's self is a generalization not fact. Not that you would know anything about that, you are merely a conspiracy theorist. You will probably die at a young age of pure stress related reasons. One day hopefully when you wake up you will look around and see, no one is out to get you.
" If you don't like another race because they are that race, then you are a racist"
Sir, look up racist. You have just given a general definition of prejudice. That is not the same as racist. Racist requires an aspect of feelings of superiority and power. Please, educate yourself before you throw around words that you don't understand. We don't mind helping to educate you, but you are at such a remedial level, that we just don't have the time. Sorry.
"Only you aren't smart enough to figure it out"
Sir, hmmm...Interesting suggestion. Maybe you can address that more in yet another comment?
You would like for to expand on why you aren't smart enough to figure it out? In another article you claimed that Tank Johnson was a victim of race discrimination. What is truly funny about that, is he broke the law. He was on parole and he was carrying a weapon...no no no silly me, he was carrying a hell of a lot of weapons. That is breaking the law. If he were a poor white man he wouldn't even be able to get out of jail never mind go to Miami to play in the Super Bowl.
Though, that is you, looking for the conspiracy. How about this, if Tank doesn't want the law to pick on him, STOP BREAKING THE DAMN LAW!
As for you sir, you are a racist, but you aren't even smart enough to figure out that even by your own definition, you are a racist. Though just like all other racist you aren't smart enough to see how stupid you really are. You do feel superior. Have a nice day. I got to go to work.
" What is truly funny about that, is he broke the law. He was on parole and he was carrying a weapon...no no no silly me, he was carrying a hell of a lot of weapons"
Sir, first of all, he hasn't been tried yet. So, we don't know that he has broken any laws yet (in the second case), he is simply accused at this point. Second, he was carrying nothing. The weapons were found in a search of his home. Third, the weapons WERE registered in AZ, so there is a chance he might not be convicted. Fourth, please shut up if you have NO clue as to what you are talking about.
"As for you sir, you are a racist, but you aren't even smart enough to figure out that even by your own definition, you are a racist. Though just like all other racist you aren't smart enough to see how stupid you really are. You do feel superior. Have a nice day. I got to go to work."
Sir, just like anyone else who can't substantiate their claims with facts, you through up your hands and walk away. I am sorry to point out that YOU don't have the right to simply change the meaning of words just so you can accuse people of being something. Call me prejudice. By definition, you might be correct.
As for feeling superior. That isn't true. But clearly, the robustness of your attacks on me and the complete lack of ability to cogently back up your accusations tips YOUR hand. I don't claim to be superior to you. But your actions clearly show anyone that can read that YOU are inferior. Sorry, your words prove it, not mine. Have a good day at work. Keep that grocery line moving.
"You would like for to expand on why you aren't smart enough to figure it out? "
Sir, thank you. You gave us exactly what we hoped for. I'll let you off your leash again....fetch!....good boy.
Believe what you want to believe, do what you want to do, it doesn't make it right but this is a free country. Each person in it has the right to feel and think anyway they so choose, be it right or wrong. Imagine before September 11th we could even say what wanted to say. Who am I to judge? In any case thank you, I may not agree with you, but I respect that you do take the time to respond to all comments. Whether for or against what you have to say. I apologize for forgetting that this is your right. In anycase, God bless, and I pray the best for you and your family.
"You would like for to expand on why you aren't smart enough to figure it out? "
Sir, thank you. You gave us exactly what we hoped for. I'll let you off your leash again....fetch!....good boy.
Nice play on a typo though. LOL,
Sir, the Economist would like its letter-answering style back, but I suggest you keep it. Your comments were backed by the article in the WSJ article yesterday about unrest in Africa due to Chinese exploitation. I look forward to reading your writings collected in book form.
"Believe what you want to believe, do what you want to do, it doesn't make it right but this is a free country. Each person in it has the right to feel and think anyway they so choose, be it right or wrong"
Sir, we never said you don't have rights. Please...continue to exercise your right to be wrong.
"Steve Nash"
Sir, where was Nash born?
"I look forward to reading your writings collected in book form"
Sir, we shall save you a leather bound, gold gilded copy.
"Sir, just like anyone else who can't substantiate their claims with facts, you through up your hands and walk away. I am sorry to point out that YOU don't have the right to simply change the meaning of words just so you can accuse people of being something. Call me prejudice. By definition, you might be correct."
Sir, I do request that in any post you intend to correct or mock another person for making a typo, you make sure you do not do so. Through should be threw. Threw, the past tense of throw, is different than through, meaning either to pass, complete, or finished. Depending on the context in which it is used.
Sir, also a comment on your definition of racist, is rather subjective. There are actually three definitions of racist-or racism.
rac·ism /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[rey-siz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
I would like to note, sir, that this is not what I am calling you but this is merely what I found in recent research. I found your statements otherwise provocative, and thoughtful.
"Sir, also a comment on your definition of racist, is rather subjective."
Sir, thanks for all your input. Your due diligence and devotion to proper word usage is admirable. That is what makes this so unfortunate.
Normally, we don't enjoy games of tit for tat. But we can't help ourselves in this case after reading your lengthy dissertation.
Please read your sentence. TAT!
(We don't have the time on our hands that you do to explain what exactly is wrong. But you're a smart guy, read it and get back to us. Explain what is wrong with the sentence structure. That is your homework for tonight. Enjoy.)
Post a Comment